The Trolley Problem: What Would You Choose?

Would you kill one person to save five people? With the increasing popularity of self-driving cars, the famous ‘trolley problem’ has turned from a philosophical riddle into a real issue awaiting a solution.

Researchers from the MIT Media Lab’s Scalable Cooperation group have surveyed over 2 million citizens from over 200 countries about morally difficult decisions that autonomous vehicles might have to make. Participants played ‘Moral Machine’, an online game designed by the researchers. In a series of potential situations on the road (mostly sudden break failures), they had to choose the lesser of two evils: for example, if it is morally more acceptable to kill a man in the car or a woman with a child crossing the street.

crash-294490_1280
Who would you save in a car crash?

As well as about 40 million recorded choices, scientists gathered a lot of demographic data such as the age, gender, or education level of the participants. However, the only patterns in moral decision making they found were geographical and cultural. For example, citizens of “eastern” countries (a term defined by the researchers, referring broadly to Asia) were less likely to save young people over the elderly than participants from elsewhere.

“The most emphatic global preferences in the survey are for sparing the lives of humans over the lives of other animals; sparing the lives of many people rather than a few; and preserving the lives of the young, rather than older people,” is how Edmond Awad, the lead author of the paper published in Nature, summarised the results.

Screenshot from 2018-11-03 18-03-25
One of the choices posed to the ‘Moral Machine’ users. Source: http://moralmachine.mit.edu/ (MIT Media Lab’s Scalable Cooperation group).

The researchers might use the data gathered in the ‘Moral Machine’ project to help engineers program self-driving cars to operate according to particular societal norms in an emergency. Moreover, public engagement is the key to building up the public’s trust in the new technology – a necessary condition to adopt autonomous vehicles on a large scale. So far “public interest in the platform surpassed our wildest expectations,” reported Iyad Rahwan, the leader of MIT Media Lab’s Scalable Cooperation group. If you also would like to browse or even create possible road situations, visit http://moralmachine.mit.edu/.

First appeared in http://felixonline.co.uk/articles/2018-11-02-the-trolley-problem-what-would-you-choose/.

 

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “The Trolley Problem: What Would You Choose?

  1. There are three ways a driver can stop his/her car: using foot brake, using handbrake, using gearbox (by changing a gear to a lower range). So all such three equivalents in autonomous car would have to fail if we wanted to consider the scenarios presented on the Moral Machine as real. What is the probability of such an unfortunate coincidence (please take note that in addition they assume that braking system failure is detected while approaching a pedestrian crossing, whereas there are many other situations when brakes are used)? My guess is that it’s not greater than the probability that you’ll find yourself in a situation where you have to decide which track the oncoming trolley should go and as a result kill one or five people 🙂

    BTW Nice article about Polish mathematicians in Wyborcza.

    Like

    1. Yes, we’re talking about events of low probability, but we still have to consider them.
      Thank you for your kind words 🙂

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Our World in Data

Maths is fun. And fun is maths!

FlowingData

Strength in Numbers

Grist

Working toward a planet that doesn’t burn, a future that doesn’t suck

Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy

Professor of Politics and Public Policy, University of Stirling

To tylko teoria

Maths is fun. And fun is maths!

Mathspig Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

CoolStatsBlog

Economics and statistics in plain English

Nintil

To estimate, compare, distinguish, discuss, and trace to its principal sources everything

Infinity Plus One

math is awesome

Quomodocumque

Math, Madison, food, the Orioles, books, my kids.

PhD Life

a blog about the PhD student experience, University of Warwick

The Thesis Whisperer

Just like the horse whisperer - but with more pages

Next Scientist

Digital Hacks To Be A Better Scientist

Daily Writing Tips

Maths is fun. And fun is maths!

Count Bayesie - A Probability Blog

Maths is fun. And fun is maths!

Eventually Almost Everywhere

A blog about probability and olympiads by Dominic Yeo

MARCOMMUNIQUE

Marketing and Communication for Nonprofit, Education, and Science

%d bloggers like this:
search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close